Development and Validation of new RP-HPLC Method for simultaneous Estimation of Methylcobalamin, Epalrestat and Pregabalin in bulk and Pharmaceutical dosage form

 

Krishnaphanisri Ponnekanti*, K. Sunitha, S. Ganapaty

GITAM Institute of Pharmacy, GITAM Deemed to be University, Rushikonda, Visakhapatnam - 5303045, India.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: krishnaphanisri@gmail.com

ABSTRACT:

A new rapid, accurate, precise and economical reverse phase high performance liquid chromatographic method has been developed and validated for simultaneous estimation of Methylcobalamin, Epalrestat and Pregabalin in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form. The separation was accomplished utilizing Agilent C18, 150 x 4.6mm, 5m column at a detection wavelength of 210nm utilizing the mobile phase water and acetonitrile 60: 40 v/v at the flow rate of 0.8ml/min and injection volume of 10µl. The total run time was 6.0 min. Validation discovered the method was specific, rapid, accurate, precise, reliable and reproducible. The calibration curve was linear over the concentration range of 0.37 – 2.25μg/ml of Methylcobalamin, 37.5-225μg/ml of Epalrestat and 37.5-225μg/ml of Pregabalin respectively with correlation coefficient of 0.999. The accuracy was determined by recovery studies and was found to be 99.5-100%. The precision of the results stated that the %RSD was <2%. The limits of detection for Methylcobalamin, Epalrestat and Pregabalin were 0.2, 0.9 and 1.2μg/ml, while the limits of quantification were 0.5, 1.5 and 0.9μg/ml respectively. Forced degradation study was carried out under acidic, alkaline, oxidative, photolytic and thermal conditions to prove the stability-indicating ability of the developed HPLC method. The high recovery confirms the suitability of developed method and can be further used in routine analysis.

 

KEYWORDS: High performance liquid chromatography, Methylcobalamin, Epalrestat, Pregabalin, Method development and Method validation.

 

 

 

INTRODUCTION:

Analytical chemistry was used to determine the qualitative and quantitative composition of material under study1. Pharmaceutical analysis is considered as interdisciplinary subject comprising of chemistry, pharmacy, physics, electronics, biology etc. It is used in identifying drug substances, called qualitative analysis, determining the concentration or amount of drug substances, called quantitative analysis and confirming the structures of drug substances2. Methylcobalamin3 was chemically 3-[({2-[(diaminomethylidene) amino]-1, 3-thiazol-4-yl}         methyl)  sulfanyl]-N'- sulfamoylpropanimidamide4.


It is one of the two coenzyme forms of vitamin B12 in the enzyme methionine synthase which functions to transfer methyl groups for the regeneration of methionine from homocysteine5. Epalrestat chemically 2-[(5Z)-5-[(E)-2- methyl-3-phenylprop-2-enylidene]-4-oxo-2- sulfanylidene-1, 3-thiazolidin-3-yl] acetic acid is an aldose reductase inhibitor used for the treatment of diabetic neuropathy6,7,8. Epalrestat (EP), a poorly water- soluble acidic type drug, with β-cyclodextrin (CD) and with water-soluble polymers9. Pregabalin Chemically is (3S)-3-(aminomethyl)-5-methylhexanoic     acid,       an anticonvulsant drug used for neuropathic pain, for partial seizures partial seizures in adults currently10 and in generalized anxiety disorder11. It is a white crystalline solid, which is soluble in water and in both basic and acidic aqueous solutions12. Pregabalin13 (PRN) is a medication used to treat epilepsy, neuropathic pain, fibromyalgia, and generalized anxiety disorder14. These triple combination drugs used for neuropathy, eye- related disorders and for treatment of Vitamin B deficiency. The chemical structures of Methylcobalamin, Epalrestat and Pregabalin are shown in Fig.1. The extensive literature survey revealed that several methods were reported for estimation of Methylcobalamin, Epalrestat and Pregabalin individually or in combination 15-19, but no chromatographic method was reported for simultaneous estimation of triple combination in combined tablet dosage form and yet to be reported. Therefore, it was essential to develop such a method for bulk and tablet dosage form. Thus, the method described was simple, sensitive, rapid, accurate, precise and stability indicating for routine quality control analysis.

 

Figure 1(a) Methylcobalamin

 

Figure 1(b) Epalrestat

 

Figure 1(c) Pregabalin

Figure 1 Chemical structure of Methylcobalamin, Epalrestat and Pregabalin

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Chemicals and reagents:

Methylcobalamin, Epalrestat and pragabalin were procured from spectrum pharma research solutions (Hyderabad). Water and acetonitrile were purchased from MERCK (India) Ltd, Worli and Mumbai India. High purity water was obtained by using Millipore Milli Q plus water purification system and are of analytical grade.

 

Instrumentation and chromatographic conditions: The chromatographic analysis was carried out on Waters HPLC equipped with Photo diode array detector. The output signal was checked and processed using Empower 2 software. UV-Visible spectrophotometer PG Instruments T60 with special bandwidth of 2mm and 10mm matched quartz cells integrated with UV win 6 Software was used for measuring absorbance of Methylcobalamin, Epalrestat and Pregabalin. Denver Electronic Balance was used for weighing. The PH meter and Ultrasonicator obtained from BVK enterprises, India The Agilent C18, (150 x 4.6mm, particle size 5mm), column was used for the study. Various mobile phases were tried in order to find the best conditions for separation of Methylcobalamin, Epalrestat and Pregabalin. The suitable mobile phase identified was water: acetonitrile (60:40 v/v). Flow rate of mobile phase was 0.8ml/min; column temperature was maintained at 30°C. The eluted compounds were monitored at a wavelength of 210nm. The sample injection volume was 10ml. Mobile phase was degassed by sonicator prior to use. All determinations were performed at ambient temperature.

 

Selection of Solvents:

On the basis of solubility study acetonitrile was selected as the solvent for dissolving.

 

Preparation of the mobile phase and diluents:

The Mobile phase was prepared by mixing water and acetonitrile in the ratio of 60:40 (v/v). The resultant solutions were mixed thoroughly and filtered through a poly-tetra-fluoro ethanol (PTFE) filter of 0.45μm pore size by means of vacuum pump and degassed by sonication to expel the dissolved gases in solvent system.

 

Preparation of standard Solution:

Standard solution was prepared by transferring an accurately weighed 0.75mg, 75mg and 75mg of Methylcobalamin, Epalrestat and Pregabalin to 50ml of clean dry volumetric flasks. The compounds were dissolved with water: acetonitrile 60:40 (v/v) and sonicated for 2 min. The solution was diluted up to the volume with water: acetonitrile 60:40 (v/v).

 

Analysis of marketed formulation:

The developed method was applied for the assay of this drug combination in the pharmaceutical formulation. 5 tablets were weighed and the average weight of tablets was calculated. Weight equivalent to 1 tablet was transferred to 100ml volumetric flask, diluents was added and sonicated for 25 minutes. Further the volume was made up with diluents and filtered. 1ml was pipetted from the filtered solution and transferred to 10ml volumetric flask. Estimation was carried out at 210nm.

 

Method Development:

The HPLC system was stabilized for thirty minutes by passing mobile phase, detector was set at 210nm, flow rate of 0.8ml/min was maintained to get a stable base line. Six replicates of a single standard solution were  injected to check the system suitability.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

The HPLC procedure was optimized with a view to develop a suitable LC method for the determination of Methylcobalamin, Epalrestat and Pregabalin in fixed dose combined dosage form. The analytical method was developed to select preliminary reversed phase HPLC chromatographic conditions, including detection wavelength, mobile phase, stationary phase, and sample preparation procedure. For this purpose, a series of trials were performed by varying the ratio of water and acetonitrile and optimizing the chromatographic conditions on Agilent C18, (150 x 4.6mm, particle size 5mm), column. Mobile phase containing water: acetonitrile taken in the ratio of 60:40v/v was selected. Methylcobalamin, Epalrestat and Pregabalin were found to show appreciable absorbance at 210nm when determined Spectro-photometrically and hence it was selected as the detection wavelength. An optimized chromatogram showing the separation of Methylcobalamin, Epalrestat and Pregabalin was shown in figure 2.

 

Figure 2: Optimized chromatogram

 

System Suitability:

A system suitability test was well defined based on results found in representative chromatograms. The column efficiency was determined from the analyte peak, the tailing factor was <2. According to ICH guidelines all the system suitability criteria during validation of the study were within the acceptance limit. The results of system suitability are depicted in table 1

 

Table 1: System suitability data

Para-meters

Methy- lcobalamin

Epalrestat

Pregabalin

Acceptance Criteria

Retention time

2.224

2.716

3.284

>2

Theoretical Plates

4262.5

4840

7204.5

>2000

Tailing factor

1.15

1.38

1.32

<2

%RSD

0.7

0.8

0.8

<2

 

Analytical method validation:

Linearity:

The peak area obtained was plotted against corresponding concentrations to obtain the calibration curve. The results of linearity study gave linear relationship over the concentration range. The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.999. The linearity data was represented in table 2.

 

Table 2: Linearity Date

Concentration (µg/ml)

Methylcobalamin

Epalrestat

Pregabalin

0

0

0

0

25

5070

591200

510664

50

10923

1180326

1110279

75

15683

1658384

1608412

100

20096

2277730

2162736

125

25677

2767411

2709007

150

30617

3308037

3203628

Statistical Analysis

Correlation coefficient

0.999

0.999

0.999

Slope

13360

14779

14416

Intercept

8085

19510

17525

 

Accuracy:

Accuracy of the method was confirmed by recovery study from marketed formulation at three levels (50%, 100%, and 150%) of standard addition. Percentage recovery for Methylcobalamin, Epalrestat and Pregabalin were found to be in the range of 98-102%. The results are depicted in table 3

Table 3: Accuracy data

Recovery %

Methylcobalamin

Epalrestat

Pregabalin

50%

100.3

99

98.76

100%

100.92

99.32

99.86

150%

98.86

100.2

100.8

 

Precision:

Precision was evaluated at the repeatability and intermediate precision levels. For repeatability analysis, six independent portions of a sample solution of Methylcobalamin, Epalrestat and Pregabalin were processed through the full analytical method and results were evaluated obtaining a % RSD value of 0.5, 0.9 and 0.3. Intermediate precision was evaluated with a new series of six portions of the same sample used in the repeatability assay, processed on a different day, one week later and by a different analyst. The corresponding % RSD was 0.7, 0.9 and 0.9.

 

Robustness:

The analytical method robustness was tested by evaluating the influence of minor modifications in HPLC conditions on system suitability parameters of the proposed method such as the composition of the mobile phase, temperature and flow rate. In all modifications, good separation of was achieved, and it was observed that the percent of recovery was within acceptable limits and the %RSD was within limit of not more than 2.0%. The tailing factors and number of theoretical plates were found within acceptable limits as well. The results are summarized in table 4.

 

LOD and LOQ:

LOD is the lowest amount of the analyte that can be detected. The results are shown in table 5.

 

Table 4: Robustness data

Percentage RSD of the drug

Flow rate

Mobile phase

Temperature

Flow rate plus

Flow rate minus

Mobile phase plus

Mobile phase minus

Temperature plus

Temperature minus

Methylcobalamin

0.6

0.8

0.9

1.1

1.1

0.4

Epalrestat

0.3

0.7

1.0

0.9

0.2

0.6

Pregabalin

0.6

0.9

0.2

0.6

0.9

0.4

 

 

Table 5: LOD and LOQ results

S No

Drug name

LOD

LOQ

1

Methylcobalamin

0.2

0.5

2

Epalrestat

0.9

1.5

3

Pregabalin

1.2

0.9

 

Specificity:

The forced degradation study for the triple combination drug revealed that drug was degraded under the influence of acid, alkali, thermal, water, hydrogen peroxide and photolytic conditions. Data was recorded in table 6

 

Table 6: Degradation results

S

No

Degradation condition

%Drug degraded

Methylcobalamin

Epalrestat

Pregabalin

1

Acid

7.30

8.04

6.64

2

Alkali

4.45

7.50

7.62

3

Thermal

3.58

6.94

5.03

4

Uv

2.42

5.30

2.26

5

Water

1.80

1.80

1.75

6

Peroxide

0.82

0.50

0.46

 

CONCLUSION:

The present research work was a simple, rapid, accurate, precise and stability indicating RP-HPLC method coupled with photo diode array detector has been developed for simultaneous estimation of Methylcobalamin, Epalrestat and Pregabalin. The developed method was completely validated with respect to linearity, accuracy, precision, robustness, sensitivity and specificity. The analytical method conditions and the mobile phase solvents provided good resolution. The main features of the analytically developed method are short run time and retention time. Hence, the simultaneous method can be successfully used for routine analysis.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

The authors are thankful to GITAM University for providing the necessary facilities to carry out this work.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

 

REFERENCES:

1.          Azim Md. S, Mitra M and Bhasinparminder S. HPLC method development and validation: A review. International Research Journal of Pharmacy, 2013; 4(4): 39-46.

2.          Janmajoy B, Padmalatha H, Rahul and Ranbir C. Method development and validation for the simultaneous estimation of epalrestat and pregabalin in bulk and pharmaceutical formulation by using rp-hplc. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2018; 8(3): 174-180.

3.          Ashutosh Kumar S, Manidipa D, Seshagiri Rao J. V. L. N and Gowri Sankar. A new, simple, sensitive, accurate and rapid analytical method development and validation for simultaneous estimation of pregabalin, mecobalamin and alpha lipoic Acid in bulk as well as in pharmaceutical dosage form by using rp-hplc. Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry. 2014; 7(4): 426-433

4.          Sreekanth.D, Ramya. P, Vishwanadh. Y and Vanitha. R. Development and method validation of rp-hplc for simultaneous determination of pregabalin and methylcobalamin in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form. 2017; 10(4): 557-565.

5.          Radhakrishnan S, Meena S and Ravindran M. Modified simultaneous spectrophotometric method development for the estimation of duloxetine and methylcobalamin in bulk, tablet and capsule dosage forms. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018; 12(6): 2877-2880.

6.          Lakshmana Rao A and Naga Navya E. Development and validation of a rp-hplc-uv method for the simultaneous determination of epalrestat and pregabalin in combined pharmaceutical formulation. Chromatography And Separation Techniques Journal, 2019; 2(1): 1-7.

7.          Janaki Pathi P and Appala Raju N. The estimation of epalrestat in tablet dosage form by rp-hplc. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2012; 2(2): 49-51.

8.          Annapurna MM, Sushmitha M and Anusha K. New analytical techniques for the determination of epalrestat in pharmaceutical dosage forms by spectrophotometry. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2017; 10(3): 739-742.

9.          Sneha J and Chandrakant M. Influence of water-soluble polymers on epalrestat ternary complexation by kneading. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2019; 12(8): 3602-3608.

10.        Tanushree S, Raju T, Bhagyashree S. P, Rupali R. M and Manoj M. N. Formulation and in-vitro evaluation of fast dissolving tablets using pregabalin as a model drug. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2015; 8(2): 154-160.

11.        Veena N, Rama Mohan Reddy T and Abbulu K. Assay method for simultaneous estimation of epalrestat and pregabalin in pure and its dosage form by rp-hplc. International Journal of Pharmacy and Analytical research, 2019; 8(1): 18-27.

12.        Santosh S, Chhajed A, Sandeep S, Sonawane, Akshada P, Pingle, Neelam D, Sakshi and Sanjay JK. Development and validation of uv spectrophotomteric method for estimation of pregabalin. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2019; 9(1): 15-18.

13.        Purushothaman P, Umar Faruk Sha A and Vetrichelvan T. Formulation development and evaluation of immediate and sustained release bilayer tablets containing amitriptyline HCl and pregabalin for the treatment of neuropathic Pain. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2017; 7 (3): 127-136

14.        Sravanthi T and Madhavi N. Stability indicating uplc method for simultaneous estimation of epalrestat and pregabalin in tablet dosage form. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2019; 12(2): 489-494.

15.        Angala Parameswari S and Arunamma G. Stability indicating rp-hplc method for simultaneous determination of epalrestat and pregabalin in bulk and tablet dosage form. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2018; 9(5): 1844-50.

16.        Krima R P et al. Liquid chromatographic estimation of epalrestat and methylcobalamin in pharmaceutical formulation. Research and Reviews: Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2014;3 (2): 35-42

17.         Keval L. C and Dilip G.M. Rp-Hplc method for the estimation of epalrestat and methylcobalamin in their combined dosage form. Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2014; 4(6): 2697-2705

18.        Dilip G. M and Keval C. Development and validation of uv spectrophotometric method for simultaneous estimation of epalrestat and methylcobalamin in the pharmaceutical dosage form. International Journal of Pharmacy Technology and Research.2014; 6(4): 1180-88

19.        Bhatt KK, Emanual MP and Aswin M. Simultaneous estimation of pregabalin and methylcobalamin in pharmaceutical formulation by rp- hplc method. Journal of Analytical and Bioanalytical Techniques, 2013; 4(1): 1-4

 

 

 

Received on 05.08.2020              Modified on 25.09.2020

Accepted on 30.10.2020             © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2021; 14(10):5097-5100.

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00888